SURVIVORS - Episode Three


BBC1 - 2nd December 2008 - 9.00pm

Is Abby slightly mad? She decides to pop out to do a bit of shopping on her own in a plague riddled post apocalyptic wilderness full of rather dubious people with big guns. Didn't she learn anything last week at the other end of a shot gun? Apparently not.

Whilst she nips out to local Netto again, Tom, a smoulderingly good Max Beesley, and Greg, erm...a smoulderingly good Paterson Joseph, decide to go in for a bit of male bonding whilst out tracking down some petrol. And then throw in the C plot about Najid and his bloody chickens and you've got quite a nicely structured episode that's actually a bit of a relief from the last two episodes which were more or less about introducing the characters and setting up their relationships to each other. What's slightly annoying is that this takes two sub-plots from the original TV series and weaves them together, the fear of contamination from the outside world that featured in Gone To The Angels and the moralising over the reintroduction of capital punishment that made Law And Order one of the best ever episodes of the original Survivors.

The main characters are too busy eyeing each other up for sex, making hen houses and driving around in expensive cars...
The drawback here is that when Abby discovers the fledgling community led by Samantha Willis we all know that the idyll it presents - electricity, hot water, communications - will ultimately, and predictably, fall to pieces. In the original Law And Order, what made that episode so moving was that Abby's own community had to decide whether to execute someone and Abby's was the casting vote. Here, Samantha Willis is simply reduced to a fascist who believes she has the right to execute trespassers to keep the group together. It's horrifying to see her turn on a sixpence and shoot someone point blank and Nikki Amuka-Bird plays it extremely well. In the end it is only Abby that is horrified by it all and as a character she doesn't have the responsibility foisted upon her whereas in the original she did. I know, we shouldn't compare the two but what's striking is how this version is pushing much of the 'instinct for survival' onto other peripheral characters. The main characters are too busy eyeing each other up for sex, making hen houses and driving around in expensive cars. It's as bad as accusing the original series characters of being too middle class. At least in the original they suffered and showed some bloody backbone for all of their trials. This lot are carrying on as if most of the population just winked out of existence rather than dropped dead from the plague. Awful, disgusting things should be happening to them. Instead, Abby decides to have birthday party after seeing someone shot through the head. Lovely woman.



Plot B was actually much more interesting and hints at what the series should be saying about survival in adversity. When Greg and Tom arrive at a farm to find petrol and discover that a father and his two kids have isolated themselves from the rest of the world simply out of fear from the virus, then the story does start explore the kind of challenges you would need to face up to. The young daughter Kate, superbly played by Sacha Parkinson, is desperate to get out of the house and feel the wind in her hair again and when she does, and inadvertently faces potential exposure to the virus from Greg and Tom, her father almost seems prepared to abandon her. There are some interesting moments between Tom and Greg that hint at Greg's troubled past. It's a far more engaging and relevant sub-plot than Abby meeting Mrs. Hitler, even if both sub-plots are intrinsically about the right to protect what's yours. Never mind, Najid's got his hen house and nearly given the game away about Al's murder of the newsagent.
So is it really a government conspiracy to do with releasing the virus deliberately...
Then we get the D plot. The insufferable and, by now, toe curling awful nonsense with the scientists in their bunker testing out some sort of vaccine. Poor little Ronny Jhutti's vaccine doesn't work and seems to increase the effects of the virus on their chosen guinea-pig, ironically an Asian man. From Samantha Willis' comments it's pretty clear that this lot are the government scientists that were struggling to deal with the outbreak and were left high and dry by its virulent progress. So is it really a government conspiracy to do with releasing the virus deliberately after all or just another dull sub-plot? Adrian Hodges claimed that the original series was more of a science fiction concept. Frankly, that's hog-wash as the fear of bacterial warfare then was just as relevant as the bird-flu scares of today. He's just trying to make it a less grimmer experience and by doing so has drained the idea of its attempt to properly examine fear and paranoia, civilisation and primitivism.



The direction by Andrew Gunn is very good, often having an abstract visual quality to it, and makes good use of the locations. Overall, the acting isn't bad and manages to cover a multitude of pompous and pretentious dialogue sins. And it's engaging, dramatic and entertaining...so why the hell can't I get enthusiastic about it? And it seems I'm not the only one as I note the viewing figures have slipped in a downwards trajectory on a weekly basis. The audience aren't perhaps chiming with this remake, then?

Technorati Tags:

Comments
4 Responses to “SURVIVORS - Episode Three”
  1. Me, I'm still loving it. I am warming to Al. The poor sod is useless and he knows it. Samantha was a superb actor - when she shot that woman I actually thought she was going to throw up. The subplot with Greg, Tom, the farmer and his sprogs was very well done - in fact, it wasn't a subplot at all! That was the main plot, and all that faffing about in the Eden Project (which I found very distracting - I kept thinking "OMG, I've been there!!!") was just filler.

    BTW, Abby is not mad. She just wanted to be alone on her son's birthday.

    I wish Al would just ask Sarah if he can have sex with her. Then she could give him a reply, and everything would be sorted. And then Sarah can ask Greg if she can have sex with him.

  2. FRANK says:

    Yeah, the Greg/Tom plot was the main plot in fact. And while we're at it why don't Greg and Tom have sex too. Yeah, and I feel sorry for Al as he is a dope and everyone can see through him.

    I see we're back in the Eden project again next week.

    Good point about Abby. How insensitive of me. Of course she wanted to be alone. But it is rather dangerous to go out alone even if you are feeling upset about your son.

    It was certainly the best episode so far and very enjoyable. It just isn't as hard hitting as it potentially could be.

  3. They need to get guns. I'd love to see Abby packing heat, spraying a crowd of looters with bullets and shouting "Die, mother****ers!" I don't reckon it'll happen though
    :-(

    Greg and Tom - yup, they definitely want each other.But not as much as Al wants Sarah. He might as well have it tattooed on his forehead.

    Seriously, I don't get why he doesn't just ask her. You can tell it all boils down to this one very basic question: "Please can you have sex with me?" All that mooning around and trying to be NICE to her is just a garnish.

    Mind you, I've never had sex with anyone so there may be an etiquette here of which I am unaware. I am just trying to apply a bit of logic to the situation.

  4. FRANK says:

    I'd prefer that version of Abby!

    Sex...it's over rated! :)

Viewing Figures

The Legal Bit

All written material is copyright © 2007-2017 Cathode Ray Tube and Frank Collins. Cathode Ray Tube is a not for profit publication primarily for review, research and comment. In the use of images and materials no infringement of the copyright held by their respective owners is intended. If you wish to quote material from this site please seek the author's permission.

Creative Commons License
Cathode Ray Tube by Frank Collins is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.